The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinars
Urbanity
Awards
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
Untitled design (8)
FIRST RELEASE TICKETS ON SALE FOR URBANITY-25 CONNECTING PROPERTY LEADERS ACROSS THE ASIA PACIFIC
FIRST TICKETS ON SALE FOR URBANITY-25 WHERE THE PROPERTY INDUSTRY CONNECTS
SEE DETAILSDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Partner Lab
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
14
print
Print
OtherPartner ContentThu 30 May 19

3 Common Mistakes Developers Make When Estimating Construction Cost

bc99d97b-b665-4919-9e3e-e6a3a93dd5e4

Construction is a tricky business. From pricing, procurement and program to site issues and product quality.

It comes as no surprise that developers around the world endure a constant battle with this critical phase of the development lifecycle.

In Australia, construction costs typically represent the largest cost item within a feasibility, usually accounting for over 50 per cent of the total project costs.

Miscalculating your construction cost is the quickest way to stifle the financial viability of your project.

Leading quantity surveyors Mitchell Brandtman has drawn on 50 years of experience to explore three of the most common mistakes that developers make when estimating their construction cost.

‘There are SQM rates and there are SQM rates!’

One of the most common ways to estimate the construction cost of a project is to apply a square metre rate ($/sq m) to the project design.

A common calculation to set a feasibility number is applying a “cost per square metre rate” by the building area (typically FECA [Fully Enclosed Covered Area] or GFA [Gross Floor Area]).

For example, a standard townhouse development of 1,000 square metres would be multiplied by a rate of $1,600 per square metre resulting in an estimate of $1,600,000.

But what does this even represent? How are you measuring the quantity (i.e. square metres) and what does the rate allow for?

For a typical residential development, you could be measuring the GFA total building area (car parking, common areas, internal areas, balconies, rooftops, etc) or you could be measuring the internal areas only (FECA). The difference is significant.

When it comes to the $/sq m rate, the same logic applies. What benchmarks are you pulling this rate from, what is the quality of your project, how are key elements like structure and services impacting the rate?

You should constantly be asking yourself: What’s included? What’s excluded? Where does the rate come from? How am I measuring this?

So just remember, there are square metre rates and there are square metre rates!

‘A unit is a unit is a unit…or is it?’

In a similar way that square metre rates pose a “one-size-fits-all” risk, so does the “per unit” methodology for estimating construction.

For example, a developer assessing a new site might say: “I’ll build a 100-unit project at $300,000 per unit, equating to a construction estimate of $30,000,000.”

There may be evidence to support this estimate, but the risk lies in a number of variables that can dramatically change the per unit estimate, such as:

• Number of dwellings
• Product mix
• Product quality
• Building height
• Number of basements
• Level of amenity and common facilities
• Site constraints

The same logic will apply with commercial, industrial and retail development, however the needle tends to swing more aggressively in residential development.

As market forces change and the residential development sectors transitions from an investor-led product to more boutique, owner-focused projects, the traditional square metre rate and cost per unit methodologies need to be scrutinised to ensure you are considering all of the project variables.

Don’t forget about the ‘other costs’…they can add up to a big number.

Don’t forget about the “other costs”…they can add up to a big number.

In most construction estimates there exists a section dedicated to ‘other costs’ or exclusions. While the individual numbers may not kill a project’s viability, the sum of these costs can often add up to a hefty figure.

Some examples of these will include:

• Costs associated with procurement (such as tender costs)
• Contingencies
• Design contingencies for consultants
• Direct contingencies for known and unknown risk factors
• Service connection fees
• Rock anchors, crane over-sail rights and / or other approvals
• Excavation in rock
• Legal fees
• Escalation
• GST

These costs are often overlooked when setting up an initial construction cost budget but are significant to and integral to the project success.


To learn more about the construction process, check out our upcoming Construction Essentials Workshop to be hosted in Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne and proudly delivered in association with Mitchell Brandtman.

Click on your city to find out more.

Brisbane: 7th June

Sydney: 20th June

Melbourne: 27th June
OtherRetailResidentialIndustrialAustraliado not useMelbourneBrisbaneOther
AUTHOR
Partner Content
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
Bankstown cbd in Sydney NSW EDM
Exclusive

Breaking Delivery Crisis Chokehold on NSW’s Biggest Housing Market

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
Healthscope Hospital EDM
Exclusive

‘Once-in-a-Decade’ Opportunities Rise in Wake of Healthscope Collapse

Clare Burnett
7 Min
Exclusive

Parking Upsize Threatens Fatal Blow to Project Feasibility

Phil Bartsch
6 Min
One New Zealand Stadium BESIX Watpac
Exclusive

Rising to a Challenge: How BESIX Watpac Topped Australia’s Builders

Clare Burnett
7 Min
Exclusive

Rewards Outstrip Risk in SE Queensland Off-The-Plan Buys

Taryn Paris
7 Min
View All >
Sponsored

Fast Funds, Real Help—Woodbridge Capital Delivers Both

Partner Content
Sydney Fish Market Blackwattle EDM
Planning

Sydney Fish Market Rezoning Clears Way for 320 Homes

Clare Burnett
Aerial photo of St Mary's Intermodal Terminal in Western Sydney now sold by Pacific National to PGIM and Cadence.
Industrial

Cadence, PGIM Team Up for $145m Freight Rail Acquisition

Marisa Wikramanayake
Pacific National has sold an intermodal terminal with a two-decade long lease to a developer-investment management firm …
LATEST
Finance

Fast Funds, Real Help—Woodbridge Capital Delivers Both

Partner Content
5 Min
Sydney Fish Market Blackwattle EDM
Planning

Sydney Fish Market Rezoning Clears Way for 320 Homes

Clare Burnett
2 Min
Aerial photo of St Mary's Intermodal Terminal in Western Sydney now sold by Pacific National to PGIM and Cadence.
Industrial

Cadence, PGIM Team Up for $145m Freight Rail Acquisition

Marisa Wikramanayake
2 Min
Bankstown cbd in Sydney NSW EDM
Exclusive

Breaking Delivery Crisis Chokehold on NSW’s Biggest Housing Market

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://theurbandeveloper.com/articles/3-common-mistakes-developers-make-when-estimating-construction-cost