The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinars
Urbanity
Awards
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
Untitled design (8)
FIRST RELEASE TICKETS ON SALE FOR URBANITY-25 CONNECTING PROPERTY LEADERS ACROSS THE ASIA PACIFIC
FIRST TICKETS ON SALE FOR URBANITY-25 WHERE THE PROPERTY INDUSTRY CONNECTS
SEE DETAILSDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
print
Print
ResidentialRalph NicholsonThu 27 Jun 24

Planning Panel Refuses 10-Storey Botany Bay Tower

Kogarah Hero

A state planning panel has refused a 10-storey residential project at Sydney’s Botany Bay, saying it failed to meet multiple planning controls and was an “inappropriately designed development” that is not supported.

The Sydney South Planning Panel said the proposed development on a combined 2554.6sq m was not considered to be in the public interest and “is likely to set an undesirable precedent if approved”.

Kogarah Investments No 3—an arm of family-owned developer and builder Level 33—had 102 apartments of one, two and three bedrooms on a combined 10 lots at 1-5 Stanley Street and 1-11 Princes Highway at Kogarah, about an 18km drive south-west of the Sydney CBD.

Plans for the $35-million project included two basement parking levels for 53 vehicles, roof-top amenity and some ground-floor retail.

However, the planning panel—an independent body not subject to the direction of the NSW Minister for Planning—said the proposal was not compliant with the site’s maximum building height of 33 metres.

In a seven-page letter advising of the planning panel’s decision, Georges River Council said the proposal had failed to show adequate onsite parking and because of that, would have an unacceptable negative impact upon on street carparking availability in the locality. 

“The proposal is deficient 62 carparking spaces,” Brendan Leo, a consultant planner with the council, wrote.

An architectural render of the Kogarah proposal.
▲ An architectural render of the Kogarah proposal.

Leo said the proposal had not shown compliance with the minimum requirements of the State Environmental Planning Policies’ Building Sustainability Index (BASIX) in terms of water saving, thermal comfort and energy efficiency.

“The proposal has numerous unresolved issues and is not supported from an urban-design perspective as it has not demonstrated design excellence as required by the clause.”

The council was told last year Level 33 tried three times to acquire an adjoining 363sq m property before filing plans for the proposed development on the 10 surrounding lots.

Documents before the council in August showed three lots would be left isolated between two medium-rise residential buildings if Level 33 was approved for the project.

“Level 33 has attempted to acquire 7, 9A and 9 Stanley Street for amalgamation into the development project, in accordance with the requirements of Section 10.1.6 of the Georges River Development Control Plan 2021,” Sutherland and Associates said in the original filing.

The developer successfully negotiated a commitment from the owners of 9 and 9A Stanley Street but had failed to convince the owner of number seven.

Level 33 was asked for comment on this story.

ResidentialOtherSydneyDevelopmentProject
AUTHOR
Ralph Nicholson
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
Darwin has sat dormant for a decade but the resource rich territory is “on the threshold” of a boom for resources and new cities. Weddel and Palmerston
Exclusive

NT Eyes Looming Boom as Planning Commissioner Bows Out

Renee McKeown
5 Min
Exclusive

Gold Coast’s Greatest Moments Yet to Come: Evan Raptis

Phil Bartsch
7 Min
MODEL founder Rory Hunter HERO
Exclusive

‘It’s Massive’: On Mission to Prove BtR Green Equals Gold

Leon Della Bosca
8 Min
Potts Point Coliving EDM
Exclusive

Co-Living Shrugs Off Stigma as Overseas Money Moves In

Clare Burnett
6 Min
Bankstown cbd in Sydney NSW EDM
Exclusive

Breaking Delivery Crisis Chokehold on NSW’s Biggest Housing Market

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
View All >
Office

Centennial Seals $50.5m Deal for Adelaide Tower

Lindsay Saunders
Kemps Creek Penrith EDM
Industrial

Frasers $281m Penrith Warehouse Precinct Greenlit

Clare Burnett
East Walker St Aland EDM
Residential

Aland Scoops Up $240m North Sydney ‘Dream’ Site

Clare Burnett
A trio of development heavy-hitters this year won approval for two towers up to 30 storeys on the site…
LATEST
Office

Centennial Seals $50.5m Deal for Adelaide Tower

Lindsay Saunders
3 Min
Kemps Creek Penrith EDM
Industrial

Frasers $281m Penrith Warehouse Precinct Greenlit

Clare Burnett
3 Min
East Walker St Aland EDM
Residential

Aland Scoops Up $240m North Sydney ‘Dream’ Site

Clare Burnett
3 Min
Paradiso Place Surfers Paradise hero
Residential

Surfers Paradise $1bn Triple-Tower Project Feasibility Juggle

Phil Bartsch
4 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://theurbandeveloper.com/articles/planning-panel-refuses-10-storey-botany-bay