The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinars
Urbanity
Awards
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
Untitled design (8)
LESS THAN 30 DAYS UNTIL OUR FLAGSHIP CONFERENCE 29-31 JULY, GOLD COAST
4 WEEKS UNTIL OUR FLAGSHIP CONFERENCE 29-31 JULY, GOLD COAST
SECURE YOUR SPOTDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
InfrastructureStaff WriterTue 12 Jul 16

Opinion: Triumph of the Broad Frontage Lot

TUD+ MEMBER CONTENT
6
SHARE
print
Print

 

For some decades now Australian suburban housing layouts have been trending toward deep plan, narrow lots containing deep plan, narrow housing with little or no backyard space. This point was first highlighted in Professor Tony Hall's book 'The Life and Death of the Australian Backyard'. Interestingly this trend has not been evident in the United States where much broader frontage lots and housing with significant backyards (on lot areas similar to those in Australia) remain the norm. Why is the narrow, deep plan house a problem, why do we build them and what is the alternative?

It is argued here that the narrow, deep plan house is generally an inferior product to the broader shallow plan house. This is based on the following inherent problems of this deep plan form:

Figure 1 - Australian examples of typical narrow frontage lots with deep plan housing (Fitzgibbon QLD)

Figure 2 - USA example of typical broad frontage lots and shallow plan housing (Oregon, USA)

b. Poor passive surveillance of the street due to limited windows and openings on the front facade (Even on two level houses the upper level rooms at the front are normally bedrooms which are not rooms from which significant surveillance of the street would occur).

c. A high proportion of hardstand driveway on the verge area limiting turf and tree planting area whilst increasing heat and runoff.

 

Figure 3 - Streetscape of garages (Australia)


c. Prevents access to cross ventilation.

d. Consumes excessive unusable side boundary clearance space along the length of the house (Can be up to 100m2 wasted).

e. Creates internal spaces with poor access to natural light.
f. Limited opportunity for views from the front or rear of the house. g. Prevents side and rear access.

 

i. Allows for a larger and more accessible rear yard.

j. Creates pleasant views from most rooms either to the street or to the rear yard. k. Better encloses the street.

l. Creates a more prestigious looking house with good 'street presence', which is ultimately more saleable.\ All this being the case, then the question is now 'Why have we, in Australia, been trending toward narrow frontage lots containing deep plan housing?' One answer is that it is initially cheaper to subdivide land into narrow parcels. By doing this a 100m length of road with all its services can be divided into say 10 lots with 10m frontage. This means each lot carries 10% of the costs. If the lots are widened to 14m this increases the percentage costs to 14% (Let us also add 1% to cover the increase in road intervals if blocks are shortened and area remains constant). The question then is how much more will a 14m wide lot sell for compared to 10m wide lot. Whilst this is a 5% increase on physical infrastructure costs it may well be only a 2% (or less) increase on the total house and land package. It is argued that this slight increase in cost is easily exceeded by the increased saleability of a shallow plan, broad frontage house.

It has been noted that, in Brisbane at least, the development on the narrow 10m wide x 40m deep lot increasingly proliferated in the post war decades. It should be noted that historically land costs have been relatively lower in comparison to physical infrastructure costs. It does make economic sense to disperse physical infrastructure costs when they form a large percentage of total costs. However, in the current market land costs are the significant factor and dispersing physical infrastructure by excessively narrowing lots is a very marginal, and ultimately a losing, game.

Next time you buy a house or lot remember that every metre of frontage is valuable and that it is not only land size that counts.

 

Matt Doolan is a Town Planner and Urban Designer with nearly 20 years of experience in the field. He is the principal Town Planner at DEVELOPTHIS Property Development Centre. He specialises in subdivision and townhouse layout designs. He is also an advisor to the Philippines National Housing Authority.

ResidentialAustraliaPlanningPlanningSector
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
"TheUrbanDeveloper.com is committed to delivering the latest news, reviews, opinions and insights into the best of urban development from Australia and around the world. "
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
Exclusive

Tapping the Bunnings ‘Halo Effect’

Taryn Paris
5 Min
Exclusive

‘Construction Not a Scale Game’: Hutchinson

Phil Bartsch
9 Min
Nation's build-to-rent project Charlie Parker in Sydney's Parramatta where more projects are being located and built outside the CBD.
Exclusive

Foreign Capital Still Dominates BtR but Things are Changing

Marisa Wikramanayake
7 Min
Exclusive

Fortis Reveals Plans for Coveted Bowen Terrace Site

Taryn Paris
4 Min
Exclusive

Accor Deputy Delivers Verdict on Brisbane Games Hotel Shortfall

Phil Bartsch
6 Min
View All >
Exclusive

Tapping the Bunnings ‘Halo Effect’

Taryn Paris
The City of Melbourne has opted to keep Greenline in the 2025-26 Budget.
Policy

Melbourne Budget Puts Paid to Greenline Future Fears

Marisa Wikramanayake
Residential

Consolidated Reveals Next Riverfront Play in $64m Deal

Leon Della Bosca AND Taryn Paris
Don O’Rorke has put his foot on “the last absolute riverfront site” and will reveal his plans before year’s end...
LATEST
Exclusive

Tapping the Bunnings ‘Halo Effect’

Taryn Paris
5 Min
The City of Melbourne has opted to keep Greenline in the 2025-26 Budget.
Policy

Melbourne Budget Puts Paid to Greenline Future Fears

Marisa Wikramanayake
4 Min
Residential

Consolidated Reveals Next Riverfront Play in $64m Deal

Leon Della Bosca AND Taryn Paris
3 Min
Deicorp Five Dock Mixed-Use Precinct
Residential

Deicorp’s $1.8bn Inner-West Sydney Precinct Greenlit

Vanessa Croll
3 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://theurbandeveloper.com/articles/triumph-broad-frontage-lot