The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinars
Urbanity
Awards
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
LESS THAN 2 WEEKS UNTIL OUR FLAGSHIP CONFERENCE JOIN MORE THAN 550 ALREADY ATTENDING
JUST 2 WEEKS TO GO UNTIL URBANITY-25 550+ ALREADY ATTENDING
REGISTER NOWDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
print
Print
OtherStaff WriterSun 26 May 13

FEATURE: Inside QLD's proposed single State Planning Policy (SPP)

9

The Queensland State Government has released a draft single State Planning Policy (SPP) for consultation and comment, closing on 12 June 2013. It combines 13 current State policies into one single policy, adding some additional matters for consideration, with 18 State Interests grouped under 5 themes.

The objectives of the single SPP are to express the State’s planning and development interests in a single place and in a complete and concise format to encourage flexible, innovative and locally appropriate approaches to planning.

It will be supported by tools and guidance material to assist implementation. Inherent in these objectives is the expectation that the single SPP will also make the planning and development assessment processes more streamlined, efficient, facilitative and transparent.

The State interests are grouped under 5 main themes:

  • Housing and liveable communities (embracing amenity and community wellbeing; land development and housing supply)

  • Economic growth (agriculture; development and construction; mining and extractive resources; tourism)

  • Environment and heritage (biodiversity; coastal environment; cultural heritage; healthy waterways)

  • Hazards and  safety (air, noise and other emissions; hazardous materials; natural hazards)

  • Transport and infrastructure (state infrastructure and services; state transport infrastructure and networks; strategic airports and aviation facilities; strategic ports; water supply catchments and infrastructure.

  • Making or amending planning instruments (planning schemes, regional plans, etc)

  • Development assessment decision making, and

  • Designating land for community infrastructure.

  • The State’s interests will be administered by the chief executive responsible for SPA, who is understood to be the Director General of DSDIP. Development applications will be coordinated by a single State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) within DSDIP.

  • While the SPP affects both plan making and development assessment (DA), only 10 of the State Interests are currently identified to have a DA function, which apply if the SPP is not already appropriately reflected in a Planning Scheme or Regional Plan and the site is a nominated geographic area, which vary for each State Interest. This limitation could impede the objective of creating more “balance” in the future decision making.

  • It is anticipated there will be a new hierarchy of planning instruments, with the SPP on top.

  • There is much work still in progress, including preparation of guidelines, the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) and off-sets. Completion of these, together with accurate mapping, will be essential for clarity and accuracy in identifying the State’s interests. It is also unclear what weight is to be given to the “Guidance Material” in the application of the SPP.

  • It is noted that some of the State Interests include matters for local governments to have regard to in preparing planning schemes which are not readily influenced by such instruments. For example in the draft policy for land development and housing supply.

  • The wording could also be tightened up to improve the clarity and practicality of implementation and would benefit from avoiding language such as “...to the greatest extent practicable” (Environment and Heritage).


A single State Planning Policy and the coordination of State Interests through a centralised State Assessment and Referral Agency are very good ideas and are arguably long overdue.

The real value, however, will be realised only through the completion of work in progress, accurate and up-to-date mapping and the release of more detail. The ultimate success will be measured through the implementation and associated culture changes to achieve the stated objectives.

 

This feature was published by THG, a Brisbane-based urban development consultancy firm specialising in Planning, Surveying, Urban Design, Economics Strategy & Research, Landscape Architecture and Marketing & Design. THG is contributing to the Urban Development Institute of Australia's (QLD) effort to compile appropriate submissions to the State Government on the draft single SPP. THG is a Foundation Member of Australia’s first national non-profit organisation focused purely on liveability – Partners for Livable Communities Australia (PLC).

OtherInfrastructureAustraliaBrisbaneOther
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
"TheUrbanDeveloper.com is committed to delivering the latest news, reviews, opinions and insights into the best of urban development from Australia and around the world. "
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
Kurraba Point 93 Kurraba Road TUD PLUS
Residential

Council Over Court: How HFO Won Rare North Sydney Approval

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
Exclusive

Why Sentinel is Betting Big on Olympic City Office Sector

Phil Bartsch
5 Min
The Port of Brisbane has released its Vision 2060 which details the need for inland rail connectivity
Infrastructure

Brisbane Port’s $15bn Future Faces One Big Obstacle

Renee McKeown
5 Min
Freecity Rouse Hill triple towers 2 Tempus Street
Exclusive

Freecity Takes Covers Off $330m Triple Towers in Sydney’s North-West

Leon Della Bosca
5 Min
Parallel Workshops Stockdale Housing PBSA project
Exclusive

Suburban Success Story Turns PBSA Thinking on its Head

Leon Della Bosca
7 Min
View All >
Residential

Fortis Plots Placemaking Project at Hamilton

Taryn Paris
NSW Housing Pattern Book HERO.
Policy

Housing Pattern Book Supercharges NSW Planning

Vanessa Croll
Kurraba Point 93 Kurraba Road TUD PLUS
Residential

Council Over Court: How HFO Won Rare North Sydney Approval

Vanessa Croll
A luxury harbourside build that’s wider and higher than permitted has been greenlit in one of the most complex LGAs in N…
LATEST
Residential

Fortis Plots Placemaking Project at Hamilton

Taryn Paris
2 Min
NSW Housing Pattern Book HERO.
Policy

Housing Pattern Book Supercharges NSW Planning

Vanessa Croll
5 Min
Kurraba Point 93 Kurraba Road TUD PLUS
Residential

Council Over Court: How HFO Won Rare North Sydney Approval

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
Inglewood Beaufort Street rendering front HERO
Residential

Apartment Scheme Revealed for Perth Heritage Strip

Leon Della Bosca
3 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://theurbandeveloper.com/articles/feature-inside-qlds-proposed-single-state-planning-policy-spp