The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinars
Urbanity
Awards
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
JUST 12 DAYS LEFT UNTIL OUR FLAGSHIP CONFERENCE JOIN MORE THAN 550 ALREADY ATTENDING
JUST 12 DAYS TO GO UNTIL URBANITY-25 550+ ALREADY ATTENDING
REGISTER NOWDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
print
Print
OfficeStaff WriterWed 17 May 17

IOF Proposal Gets Cromwell's Downvote

i

Cromwell Property Group has voted its entire Investa Office Fund (IOF) holding against the proposed partial internalisation of the IOF management platform.

Cromwell is reportedly the single largest shareholder in IOF, holding 9.83% of securities.

Cromwell said they believed implementation of the proposal represents a “worst of all worlds” outcome for IOF investors.

"The proposal is a compromised, related party transaction which materially benefits Investa Commercial Property Fund while offering limited value and marginal accretion for IOF investors at a cost of at least $45 million," the company said.

"The transaction essentially results in IOF acquiring future uncertainty, embedding questionable governance practices, and reducing investor value both now and in the context of any potential future third party acquisition opportunity."Cromwell specified six issues that fuelled their stance:1. "No certainty on Return on Investment: IOF investors are being asked to outlay $45 million for management rights, the value of which can subsequently and significantly reduced as soon as 2020.

"There is no lock up period to protect the management rights IOF investors are being asked to pay for."2. "The Proposal will have a negative impact on the value of IOF securities, as the Independent Expert Report acknowledged. The Proposal and the impact of the pre-emptive rights granted to IOMH are such that any offer from a bidder for IOF will be materially diminished in recognition of the scale down costs for the sale of the Platform.

"The anticipated decline in IOF’s NTA by $0.07 set out in the Notice of Meeting is material."4. "The partial “internalisation” is at its core an unsatisfactory concept. We remain highly skeptical of the proposed governance arrangements and in our view the Proposal appears to embed, continued adverse governance practices. IOF only receives two of six board seats meaning IOM and ICPF can outvote IOF. The effective rights of veto granted to IOM over the management and operation of the Management Platform allow IOMH and IOM to act in ways that may not be in the best interests of IOF investors."5. "There is little, or, at best, marginal, financial benefit to IOF investors: Management’s own estimates indicate the proposal will add just 0.2 cents per security to Funds From Operations from 2018. The platform has a high cost structure resulting in minimal accretion despite being wholly debt funded – it is a structure that benefits management rather than investors."6. "Absence of a “best interests opinion”: while not technically required in this case, it is striking that the Independent Expert is silent on whether the transaction is actually in the best interests of IOF investors, as is usual market practice. Investors are owed an explanation as to why the Independent Expert was not asked to provide an opinion on whether the transaction was actually in investors’ best interests, particularly in light of the transaction resulting in a material payment to a related party."

OfficeAustraliaFinanceLegalSector
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
"TheUrbanDeveloper.com is committed to delivering the latest news, reviews, opinions and insights into the best of urban development from Australia and around the world. "
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
GYG EDM
Exclusive

GYG Reveals Real Estate Tactics Behind 1000-Store Growth Plan

Clare Burnett
7 Min
Kurraba Point 93 Kurraba Road TUD PLUS
Residential

Council Over Court: How HFO Won Rare North Sydney Approval

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
Exclusive

Why Sentinel is Betting Big on Olympic City Office Sector

Phil Bartsch
5 Min
The Port of Brisbane has released its Vision 2060 which details the need for inland rail connectivity
Infrastructure

Brisbane Port’s $15bn Future Faces One Big Obstacle

Renee McKeown
5 Min
Freecity Rouse Hill triple towers 2 Tempus Street
Exclusive

Freecity Takes Covers Off $330m Triple Towers in Sydney’s North-West

Leon Della Bosca
5 Min
View All >
Psiquantum facility in Brisbane
Technology

Brisbane Quantum Computing Megaproject Moves Forward

Leon Della Bosca
Social housing in Melbourne, Victoria, where HAFFF Round Two will deliver 5001 social homes.
Affordable & Social Housing

Social Housing Projects Across Nation Win HAFFF Funds

Marisa Wikramanayake
Stamford Capital Peter O'Connor presents on the debt market.
Markets

Thin Underwriting, Pushy Practices: Banks’ Gripes on Private Credit

Taryn Paris
The appetite to lend is stronger than ever. Stamford Capital's Peter O'Connor drills into what is underpinning the growt…
LATEST
Psiquantum facility in Brisbane
Technology

Brisbane Quantum Computing Megaproject Moves Forward

Leon Della Bosca
3 Min
Social housing in Melbourne, Victoria, where HAFFF Round Two will deliver 5001 social homes.
Affordable & Social Housing

Social Housing Projects Across Nation Win HAFFF Funds

Marisa Wikramanayake
3 Min
Stamford Capital Peter O'Connor presents on the debt market.
Markets

Thin Underwriting, Pushy Practices: Banks’ Gripes on Private Credit

Taryn Paris
1 Min
Development

Covering the Gaps: How iCreate Fixes Common Developer Marketing Traps

Marisa Wikramanayake
4 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://www.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/iof-proposal-gets-cromwell